-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Misclassified cells in corners - plateU7rep1_20200519_210009_665 - C04-0005 #88
Comments
|
@tischi |
re (2): Maybe doing an additional radius=1 opening after that would help to remove spatial high frequency noise, depends on (1). |
You can try a few things:
The general issue with a white top hat is that it does not work well with images that have a lot of noise. So either you try to remove the noise before applying it (1 and 2) or you don't use it, but rather do median subtraction (3). |
...I am not so sure anymore if it makes a difference whether you remove the noise before or after the tophat. I have to play a bit with it myself. Could I have access to the images just after flat-field correction (without any further processing)? |
@tischi Yes, the 'marker' channel is what you are looking for. After the tophat is called 'marker_tophat'. That minus background is 'marker_tophat_background_subtracted'. Before flat-field correction is 'marker_raw'. |
And in which folder should I look on the kreshuk server? |
|
flat-field is very gooda bit higher noise in the corners......as expected because there we have less signal to the the illumination profile tophat filter increases overall brightness of high noise regions...this is an annoying property of the |
The flatfield correction is so good now that I wonder wether we should just not do anything more. For sure the white top hat is problematic due to the high and spatially varying noise levels. As we discussed some time ago, what I may have done is a connected component analysis on the pixels that are above threshold in each cell and only keep connected components that have a minimal size and then base the decision whether to classify a cell as infected based on that. That would be a way to distinguish noise from real virus regions. As a quick fix I would suggest to try to simply remove the white top hat filter as it seems to do more harm than good. |
{"plateName":"plateU7rep1_20200519_210009_665","siteName":"C04-0005","pixelLocation":[11375.74293134145,7246.784387298996,0.0],"analysisVersion":"?"}
In many Images of the new plates, the infected/control classification fail in the corners, especially (at leas from my impression) the top left. A lot of control cells are classified as infected.
I think I know the reason: The Flatfield correction, which is more extreme in the new plates, enhances the noise in the corners, up to a factor in the order of 10. Hence, the 0.95 quantile, which is used as the feature for the cell classification, rises as well, leading to the misclassification.
Any Ideas for an easy fix?
Screenshot
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: