Simplifying property configuration

[ghost]

I've been skimming over the property module, and I think it needs some TLC. We have no fewer than 8 report methods, and I think we can probably do better here. What I was thinking is that we could maybe make combinators that allow configuring a property, something like:

let property = // ...
property
|> Property.withTests 500
|> Property.withRecheck seed size
|> Property.check

This would translate into the LINQ interface like:

var property = // ...
property
    .WithTests(500)
    .WithRecheck(seed, size)
    .Check();

I'm curious to hear thoughts on this. Apologies up front if this was suggested before.

/cc @moodmosaic @TysonMN @dharmaturtle

[TysonMN]

This looks great to me. I think this would be an excellent improvement. In fact, I think it would make my work on issue #332 / draft PR #336 easier.

Would anyone like to start working on this now?

[dharmaturtle]

I'm a bit busy this weekend, but I can look into it the following week - unless someone feels like beating me to the punch.

[ghost]

I created issue #343 for this. Probably the simplest way to do this is to make property a PropertyConfig * Gen<(Journal * Outcome<'a>)>?