Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mainnet Execution Simulation #1503

Open
hugocaillard opened this issue Jul 11, 2024 · 7 comments · May be fixed by #1509
Open

Mainnet Execution Simulation #1503

hugocaillard opened this issue Jul 11, 2024 · 7 comments · May be fixed by #1509
Assignees

Comments

@hugocaillard
Copy link
Collaborator

hugocaillard commented Jul 11, 2024

Mainnet Execution Simulation

This feature allows developers to fork the Mainnet state in Clarinet Simnet.

Use cases:

  • When Clarinet projects rely on deployed contracts, such as DeFi protocols or oracles, it can be challenging to populate these protocols with real-world data. This feature enables the use of Mainnet data in unit tests or the Clarinet console.
  • It also enables the simulation of a Mainnet transaction before actually running it.

This feature aims to be data-efficient and only fetches the necessary marf data and metadata.

This specification outlines the work required in the following three main areas:

Clarinet

This feature impacts the Clarinet datastore, which implements the ClarityBackingStore trait. When the Simnet attempts to read data from the store, it first checks if it is available locally. If not, it fetches the data from the network and writes the result locally. The desired chaintip (or block hash) will be set in the project manifest, allowing for consistent data retrieval from the network with efficient caching.

Clarinet will rely on an API key or auth token set in ~/.clarinet/clarinetrc.toml or an environment variable. This can also be set using the clarinet login command and integration with the Platform. However, this can be done at a later stage.

New manifest settings (Clarinet.toml) (naming to be confirmed):

  • [simnet]
    • fork_network: boolean (false)
    • network_api_url: string (https://api.hiro.so)
    • chaintip: number (none)

New command:

  • clarinet simnet enable-mainnet-fork to configure the simnet settings and set the chaintip to the current height

New Stacks RPC endpoints

To enable the simnet Datastore to read data from a specific Stacks network, the Stacks nodes need to expose two new RPC endpoints:

  • /v2/clarity_marf_value/:clarity_marf_key

    • Takes an optional tip query parameter
    • Takes an optional proof query parameter (defaults to false in this context)
  • /v2/clarity_metadata/:principal/:contract_name/:clarity_metadata_key

    • Does not take a tip query parameter
    • Does not take a proof query parameter

Stacks Hiro API rate limiting and caching

By default, Clarinet will attempt to fetch data from Hiro's infrastructure (https://api.hiro.so/v2, https://api.testnet.hiro.so).

Note: It will be possible to configure the simnet to use a different API endpoint.

Question: When RPC endpoints are added, are any actions required on Hiro Stacks API?

API key

To fetch these endpoints, it is recommended to provide an API key. The API key should work both locally and in CI. In order of priority, Clarinet will attempt to get an API key or token from:

  1. Environment variable HIRO_API_KEY
  2. Clarinet config file ~/.clarinet/clarinetrc.toml, under the property hiro_api_key - In the future, users could log in (set this token) with the command clarinet login

If no API key is available, Clarinet will recommend using one. It will still be possible to perform queries, but with a limited rate limit. Can we and should we set higher rates for these endpoints?

Caching

Since the fetched data is immutable, the caching strategy can be aggressive.

Examples:

  • /v2/clarity_metadata/<addr>/hello-world/vm-metadata::9::contract-size
    • Returns immutable data and can be cached forever
  • /v2/clarity_marf_value/vm::<addr>.hello-world::1::bar?tip=<tip>&proof=false
    • Returns immutable data and can be cached forever
  • /v2/clarity_marf_value/vm::<addr>.hello-world::1::bar?proof=false
    • Cannot be efficiently cached if tip is not set (it fetches current tip data). In practice, Clarinet will almost always set the tip
@CharlieC3
Copy link
Member

Stacks Hiro API rate limiting and caching

Question: When RPC endpoints are added, are any actions required on Hiro Stacks API?

For rate-limiting, no actions are needed. Rate-limiting defaults and API key processing gets configured on any service or endpoint we expose by default.

API key

The API key should work both locally and in CI.

We can provide a special API key for CI to use with a higher rate-limit if needed, encrypted by Github Secrets. Additionally, it may be best if CI strictly tests against our staging environment for better/safer separation.

Caching

These are great examples, thanks for putting thought into this area; it really helps our infra stay healthy. When the final implementation is just about ready, I would suggest submitting a new devops issue with the specific caching needs on each type of endpoint for us to set up.

@hugocaillard
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@CharlieC3

API key

This is for users to use, both locally and in their CI. We would expect them to use it against a mainnet node.

Rate limiting

Could we use specific rate limiting rules for these 2 endpoints?

I also need to tests against real-world use case what would be a reasonable limit

@CharlieC3
Copy link
Member

This is for users to use, both locally and in their CI. We would expect them to use it against a mainnet node.

Gotcha, they should be able to use their own API key(s) in that case.

Could we use specific rate limiting rules for these 2 endpoints?

Yup we can do that. Do you know roughly how many calls/minute would be made to these endpoints? Are we talking hundred(s), thousand(s), tens of thousand(s), etc?

@zone117x
Copy link
Member

When RPC endpoints are added, are any actions required on Hiro Stacks API?

No action needed

@neogranicen
Copy link

neogranicen commented Jul 14, 2024

Is the team working on this feature and how long will it take them?

As Security researches we are in desperate need of this to write Poc's

@hugocaillard
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@neogranicen Yes we are currently working on it. It's a bit early to communicate on timelines. Please subscribe to this issue to get future updates

@neogranicen
Copy link

any news @hugocaillard ??

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: 🏗 In Progress
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants