We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
你好呀,十分感谢分享工作! 关于ikdtree 点云插入效率的问题我有个疑问,希望能得到解答: 我在测试的时候发现,在插入点不多的情况下(如300个点)的确效率还可以,时间在2-3ms内;但是当如果插入的是一个瓦片地图(如30000个点)的话,我发现插入效率还不如pcl中的kdtree,我是否可以认为ikdtree目前的版本是比较适合高频少点的插入方式,而不是低频多点的插入方式呢?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
你好呀,十分感谢分享工作!
关于ikdtree 点云插入效率的问题我有个疑问,希望能得到解答:
我在测试的时候发现,在插入点不多的情况下(如300个点)的确效率还可以,时间在2-3ms内;但是当如果插入的是一个瓦片地图(如30000个点)的话,我发现插入效率还不如pcl中的kdtree,我是否可以认为ikdtree目前的版本是比较适合高频少点的插入方式,而不是低频多点的插入方式呢?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: