-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Condition] !!! ValueSet 'Code' BeProblem #50
Comments
WG: we will organize an additional meeting with more clinicians. The clinicians in the meeting should be aware of the concept of structured registration, SNOMED CT, and the impact on the UI and the backend of an HIS. Anne will organize the meeting and take suggestions from the participants in the WG. Philippe Vandenbergh and Filip Veldeman will limit the group to a workable audience. |
I checked with my reference GP for terminology and structure here (Manu Berquin), and she thinks 'finding' codes should be possible in the 'problem' careset, o.a. when there is no diagnostic/condition yet. |
@bdc-ehealth I would like to join the meeting as well |
Hello, @annabel-uzl I think what Bart means is that the UI to search and select the right code is a key factor to adoption. This does not depend on the data model used under the hood (which should not be FHIR imo). |
Medispring, UZ Leuven and EarlyTracks would like to participate in the meeting. Can you invite them? |
Thank you Bart.
Please also include @rosen Cren ***@***.***> from our team to
join the meeting.
Best regards,
Antoine
…On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 11:55 AM Bart Decuypere (eHealth) < ***@***.***> wrote:
@annenerenhausen <https://github.com/annenerenhausen> ,
Medispring, UZ Leuven and EarlyTracks would like to participate in the
meeting. Can you invite them?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#50 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AW3IVNJD7Y65B4KU3PPUMSTZFQ4QZAVCNFSM6AAAAABHK2ROXWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCNBUG43TKNJUHA>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
I reference to issues #45 and #22
We would like to define a valueset for BeProblem code element such that we are sure mapping on the right codes (EPD codes to code of the valueset).
At the moment we are looking at SNOMED codes under the 404684003 (Clinical finding) hierarchy or '160245001 No current problems or disability'. We try to keep it as narrow as possible in the hope that what we define on BE level is more broad ;)
Opinions / Concerns / ...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: