Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Condition] !!! ValueSet 'Code' BeProblem #50

Open
annabel-uzl opened this issue May 7, 2024 · 6 comments
Open

[Condition] !!! ValueSet 'Code' BeProblem #50

annabel-uzl opened this issue May 7, 2024 · 6 comments

Comments

@annabel-uzl
Copy link

I reference to issues #45 and #22
We would like to define a valueset for BeProblem code element such that we are sure mapping on the right codes (EPD codes to code of the valueset).

At the moment we are looking at SNOMED codes under the 404684003 (Clinical finding) hierarchy or '160245001 No current problems or disability'. We try to keep it as narrow as possible in the hope that what we define on BE level is more broad ;)

Opinions / Concerns / ...

@annabel-uzl annabel-uzl changed the title ValueSet 'Code' BeProblem [Condition] ValueSet 'Code' BeProblem May 13, 2024
@bdc-ehealth
Copy link
Contributor

WG: we will organize an additional meeting with more clinicians. The clinicians in the meeting should be aware of the concept of structured registration, SNOMED CT, and the impact on the UI and the backend of an HIS. Anne will organize the meeting and take suggestions from the participants in the WG. Philippe Vandenbergh and Filip Veldeman will limit the group to a workable audience.

@AlexisVZ-MDS
Copy link

I checked with my reference GP for terminology and structure here (Manu Berquin), and she thinks 'finding' codes should be possible in the 'problem' careset, o.a. when there is no diagnostic/condition yet.

@annabel-uzl
Copy link
Author

@bdc-ehealth I would like to join the meeting as well
We will try to gather some more examples (the ones given during the meeting are Disorientated in place (finding) and Incontinence of feces (finding))
About the impact on the UI I'm not following. FHIR is used to exchange data, outside of openEHR I don't know of any EPD that has FHIR as a data model on the backend...

@antoine-earlytracks
Copy link

Hello,
@bdc-ehealth Could you invite us to too to this meeting? At EarlyTracks we have built and improved ValueSets for problems and specialties for a few years now and we would gladly share our experience. These ValueSets are used by a large amount of institutions in Belgium already.

@annabel-uzl I think what Bart means is that the UI to search and select the right code is a key factor to adoption. This does not depend on the data model used under the hood (which should not be FHIR imo).
We share that opinion based on our experience in the field, this had lead us to make a "context aware recommendation engine" that suggest codes based on user text search but also a series of additional context elements such as the specialty, past user behavior and very soon, the existing patient data. The system also learns to provide recommendation with the right level of granularity (e.g. we start with Diabetes Type 2 and not a super complicated version of it).

@bdc-ehealth
Copy link
Contributor

@annenerenhausen ,

Medispring, UZ Leuven and EarlyTracks would like to participate in the meeting. Can you invite them?

@antoine-earlytracks
Copy link

antoine-earlytracks commented Jun 4, 2024 via email

@annabel-uzl annabel-uzl changed the title [Condition] ValueSet 'Code' BeProblem [Condition] !!! ValueSet 'Code' BeProblem Sep 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants