Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Request] Make Solarcharger integration more generic #1408

Open
AndreasBoehm opened this issue Nov 19, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

[Request] Make Solarcharger integration more generic #1408

AndreasBoehm opened this issue Nov 19, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@AndreasBoehm
Copy link
Member

AndreasBoehm commented Nov 19, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

Multiple people requested to feed solarcharger data via MQTT and the first step to make that possible is to make the solarcharger integration more generic. This will also make it easier to integrate solarchargers from different brands in the future.

Describe the solution you'd like

  • Rename 'VE.Direct' to 'Solarcharger' in translations everywhere where its not about Victron specific settings
  • Rename classes that are not Victron specific
  • Add 'Provider' dropdown on 'Solarcharger' admin page that contains 'VE.Direct' as the only option
  • Create generic Solarcharger-Provider integration with a separate VE.Direct implementation

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Additional context

#457

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant