Skip to content

[Request] Make Solarcharger integration more generic #1408

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
AndreasBoehm opened this issue Nov 19, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #1457
Closed

[Request] Make Solarcharger integration more generic #1408

AndreasBoehm opened this issue Nov 19, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #1457
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@AndreasBoehm
Copy link
Member

AndreasBoehm commented Nov 19, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

Multiple people requested to feed solarcharger data via MQTT and the first step to make that possible is to make the solarcharger integration more generic. This will also make it easier to integrate solarchargers from different brands in the future.

Describe the solution you'd like

  • Rename 'VE.Direct' to 'Solarcharger' in translations everywhere where its not about Victron specific settings
  • Rename classes that are not Victron specific
  • Add 'Provider' dropdown on 'Solarcharger' admin page that contains 'VE.Direct' as the only option
  • Create generic Solarcharger-Provider integration with a separate VE.Direct implementation

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Additional context

#457

Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new discussion or issue for related concerns.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 18, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant