Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

PBO through the combinatorially symmetric cross-validation (CSCV) method #382

Open
huaiweicheng opened this issue Jun 11, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

PBO through the combinatorially symmetric cross-validation (CSCV) method #382

huaiweicheng opened this issue Jun 11, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers

Comments

@huaiweicheng
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

Describe the solution you'd like
In Advances in Financial Machine Learning Chapter 11 The dangers of backtesting provides us a method to estimate the probability of backtesting.
I think it is a very useful method to evaluate the performance of strategies. However, I do not find it implemented in mlfinlab.

Describe alternatives you've considered

Additional context
@PanPip
Copy link
Contributor

PanPip commented Jun 15, 2020

Hi @huaiweicheng,

Thank you for mentioning this! We will look deeper into this method and will add its implementation to MlFinLab package in the soon future. 🙂

@PanPip PanPip self-assigned this Jun 15, 2020
@PanPip PanPip added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 15, 2020
@PanPip PanPip added the good first issue Good for newcomers label Jun 30, 2020
@PanPip PanPip removed their assignment Sep 12, 2022
@Saharshjain78
Copy link

Hey @PanPip, is this issue still open, and may you please explain more about the issue?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@huaiweicheng @PanPip @Saharshjain78