Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Not working in Arc broswer #230

Open
MatthewYe opened this issue Jan 19, 2023 · 13 comments
Open

Not working in Arc broswer #230

MatthewYe opened this issue Jan 19, 2023 · 13 comments

Comments

@MatthewYe
Copy link

是不是和 Arc 浏览器的自定义地址栏不兼容?

@Folyd Folyd changed the title 在 Arc 浏览器里是可以安装的,但是没法使用。 Not working in Arc broswer Jan 19, 2023
@shuizhongyueming
Copy link

I'm using Arc with:
Version 1.32.0 (46908)
Chromium Engine Version 122.0.6261.94

And it is still not working. Type rs then space or tab, cannot trigger the extension

image

@SteveLauC
Copy link
Contributor

Does anyone know what that rs is in Chrome's terminology? Then we can figure out why it is not supported in Arc and possibly get this fixed

@xxchan
Copy link
Contributor

xxchan commented Apr 4, 2024

It is omnibox. I complained this to Arc but haven't got any response :(

@SteveLauC
Copy link
Contributor

omnibox.

Thanks for showing me this!

I complained this to Arc but haven't got any response :(

This is indeed unfortunate, a google search shows me only few posts about this missing API support, so I guess it won't come in the near future:<

@kianenigma
Copy link

Have switched to Arc today and this is so far the only feature I miss :(

@xxchan
Copy link
Contributor

xxchan commented Jun 1, 2024

Please submit feedback to Arc to make it more possible for them to fix this issue..

@Folyd
Copy link
Member

Folyd commented Jul 23, 2024

I built another brand-new product called https://query.rs, welcome to give it a try. :)

Query.rs was inspired by Rust Search Extension. Due to the partial support of the omnibox API by some browsers, Rust Search Extension is not available on browsers such as Safari, Vivaldi, Arc, etc. Query.rs addresses this gap.

@xxchan
Copy link
Contributor

xxchan commented Jul 23, 2024

query.rs looks quite neat! But I think one thing I loved a lot about rust-serach-extension is the ability to do search in the search bar (indeed the omnibox API), without the need to open a webside.

So currently I switched to raycast + dash (with cargo-docset) to get a similar experience.

@xxchan
Copy link
Contributor

xxchan commented Jul 23, 2024

Oh, perhaps I can just add query.rs as a raycast quicklink, then it's not too slow I guess. Although the most ideal form is still a raycast entension I guess, but it needs additional development efforts. This seems to be good enough.

@SteveLauC
Copy link
Contributor

The thing I love about Rust search extension is that I can do the search locally without pulling in any network connection (I use the local mode), so query.rs won't help too much for me.

It would be amazing if we can have Rust search extension integrated with Raycast, can image this combination will be quite attractive for macOS users🤩

@Folyd
Copy link
Member

Folyd commented Jul 23, 2024

Raycast extension is a great idea. I'll investigate how much effort it would take to migrate Rust Search Extension to Raycast. If it's not too much, I'll do it.

BTW, query.rs will be more powerful in the future. For example, I plan to support full-text search, AI search, etc.

@SteveLauC
Copy link
Contributor

I plan to support full-text search, AI search, etc.

You mean searching the document body, not just the Rust symbols? This is gonna be huge!

@Folyd
Copy link
Member

Folyd commented Jul 23, 2024

I plan to support full-text search, AI search, etc.

You mean searching the document body, not just the Rust symbols? This is gonna be huge!

Yes, I plan to build a full-text search index for all doc texts. You'll be able to search for functions, traits, etc., if their doc text matches your keyword.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants