Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(weaver): revisit COPM organization configuration interfaces #3656

Open
jenniferlianne opened this issue Nov 27, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@jenniferlianne
Copy link

jenniferlianne commented Nov 27, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

Following from the discussion here: #3625 (comment) the weaver team will revisit the configuration interfaces for the copm module.

I suggest that this happen as part of a product management effort that considers the full weaver system configuration, with analysis and documentation of the user story maps for:

  • setting up a new organization
  • adding a new asset type for transfer or exchange
  • removing an asset type for transfer or exchange
  • removing an organization

This should include a definition of the roles who will be involved as well as key parameters such as:

  • the maximum number of supported organizations
  • the maximum number of asset contracts that can be transferred or exchanged
  • traceability requirements for who has made changes to the configuration and when (eg. support for ALCOA standards)

As this will drive the technical choices.

@jenniferlianne jenniferlianne added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 27, 2024
@jenniferlianne jenniferlianne changed the title Revisit COPM organization configuration interfaces feat(weaver) revisit COPM organization configuration interfaces Nov 27, 2024
@jenniferlianne jenniferlianne changed the title feat(weaver) revisit COPM organization configuration interfaces feat(weaver): revisit COPM organization configuration interfaces Nov 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants