You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello, I was reviewing the smart contract and noticed a common pattern where state variables are updated after external calls. This often creates a vulnerability for reentrancy attacks. To confirm this, I used Slither, a static analysis tool, to check for any potential reentrancy issues. The analysis revealed several instances where reentrancy attacks are possible. Here is a list of some of the functions where this vulnerability exists:
OpenZeppelin's ReentrancyGuard is gas-efficient and can be implemented without interfering with the existing business logic of the contract, making it a suitable solution for this case.
Please let me know if you would like me to proceed with a pull request to address this issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello, I was reviewing the smart contract and noticed a common pattern where state variables are updated after external calls. This often creates a vulnerability for reentrancy attacks. To confirm this, I used Slither, a static analysis tool, to check for any potential reentrancy issues. The analysis revealed several instances where reentrancy attacks are possible. Here is a list of some of the functions where this vulnerability exists:
To address these vulnerabilities, the following are some of the mitigation approaches:
OpenZeppelin's ReentrancyGuard is gas-efficient and can be implemented without interfering with the existing business logic of the contract, making it a suitable solution for this case.
Please let me know if you would like me to proceed with a pull request to address this issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: