Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Shared configuration files #45

Open
samaloney opened this issue Sep 30, 2021 · 4 comments
Open

Shared configuration files #45

samaloney opened this issue Sep 30, 2021 · 4 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request reviewed 2024-10
Milestone

Comments

@samaloney
Copy link
Collaborator

So we have created a sub repo for shared configuration files (https://github.com/i4Ds/STIX-CONF/branches) this can be mapped to any location in this repo e.g STIX-GSW/stix/dbase/new

I would propose we move all need configuration files here and clean as we go (no binary file, only csv with proper headers) you see I've have format we can copy for lot of file with an index file (https://github.com/i4Ds/STIX-CONF/blob/main/elut/elut_index.csv) which links the relevant file for that time period.

What are people thoughts? Also need to think about if we use SCET or UTC times or both an other?

@grazwegian
Copy link
Collaborator

Seems like a good plan. I like the format with an index file. I think a lot of what we currently have in dbase will be removed in the cleanup.

@FredSchuller
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @samaloney
I'm wondering if that's the place where I should store the aspect-related parameter files (both small files, e.g. containing calibration coefficients, and big [binary] files, containing the simulated data that my procedure needs in order to derive the aspect solution).
Or should I better create a subdirectory under STIX-GSW/stix/dbase/ ?

@samaloney
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Still an issue

@samaloney
Copy link
Collaborator Author

From #74

So we have some files in stix/dbase/demo/vis_demo and other files in stix/dbase/grid it would be good if we could merge where possible and standardise the formatting

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request reviewed 2024-10
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants