QL spectra has repeating detectors sequences after coming back from safe mode

[nicHoch]

The detector order in the spectrogram is sometimes "out of sync"

...
  0,  1,  2,  3,  4,  5,  6,  7,  8,  9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31,
  0,  1,  2,  3,  4,  5,  6,  7,  8,  9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31,
  0,  1,  2,  3,  4,  5,  6,  7,  8,  9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23,  
  8,  9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31,
  0,  1,  2,  3,  4,  5,  6,  7,  8,  9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31,
  0,  1,  2,  3,  4,  5,  6,  7,  8,  9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 

partly the sequence is overlapping . Result is that the entire Array can not reshaped into a ... x 32 array.

so the processing for this ql spectra stops and no files are created.

Cases:

solo_LB_stix-21-6-32_0642384000_V01.fits 2020-05-10 Save mode event
solo_LB_stix-21-6-32_0663120000_V01.fits 2021-01-05 Save mode event
solo_LB_stix-21-6-32_0666748800_V01.fits 2021-02-16 Save mode event
solo_LB_stix-21-6-32_0674784000_V01.fits 2021-05-20 Save mode event
solo_LB_stix-21-6-32_0685584000_V01.fits 2021-09-22 Save mode event
solo_LB_stix-21-6-32_0690336000_V01.fits 2021-11-16 Save mode event
solo_LB_stix-21-6-32_0700531200_V01.fits 2022-03-14 Some Save mode events
solo_LB_stix-21-6-32_0703728000_V01.fits 2022-04-20 STIX was off for some days
solo_LB_stix-21-6-32_0706147200_V01.fits 2022-05-18 Save mode event
solo_LB_stix-21-6-32_0708652800_V01.fits 2022-06-16 Save mode event
solo_LB_stix-21-6-32_0713059200_V01.fits 2022-08-06 Save mode event
solo_LB_stix-21-6-32_0713145600_V01.fits 2022-08-07 Save mode event

so it looks like that the creation of QL spectra does not good clean up while going to save mode and coming back. some of the detectors are repeated.

Possible solution would be to delete the double available detectors but we have to decide if this is worth doing.

[samaloney]

Reference to #398