Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Investigate number of incomplete science data requests #351

Open
Tracked by #398
samaloney opened this issue Jun 8, 2023 · 4 comments
Open
Tracked by #398

Investigate number of incomplete science data requests #351

samaloney opened this issue Jun 8, 2023 · 4 comments
Labels
investigation investigation

Comments

@samaloney
Copy link
Collaborator

Incomplete in this context means an incomplete packet sequence. A quick look seems to indicate it is a very low number approx 11 out of 19936 or 0.05%

# ipython magic
lb_files = !find . \( -name '*21-6-20*.fits' -o -name '*21-6-21*.fits' -o -name '*21-6-22*.fits' -o -name '*21-6-23*.fits' -o -name '*21-6-24*.fits' \)
lb_uids = []
for f in lb_files:
    *dirs, name = f.split('\\')
    parts = name.split('_')
    uid, tcref = parts[-1].split('-')
    lb_uids.append(uid)

# ipython magic
l0_files = !find . \( -name '*xray-rpd*.fits' -o -name '*xray-cpd*.fits' -o -name '*xray-scpd*.fits' -o -name '*xray-vis*.fits' -o -name '*xray-spec*'  \)
l0_uids = []
for f in l0_files:
    *dirs, name = f.split('\\')
    parts = name.split('_')
    uid, tcref = parts[-1].split('-')
    l0_uids.append(uid)


set(lb_uids).difference(set(l0_uids))

Result

{'0074661888',
 '0074661904',
 '2112090002',
 '2203151617',
 '2204028914',
 '2209279737',
 '2209280787',
 '2302120212',
 '2302257105',
 '2304131472',
 '2305104430'}
@samaloney
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Curiously extending to L1 we find one less, 2305104430, which I don't fully understand ...

l1_files = !find . \( -name '*xray-rpd*.fits' -o -name '*xray-cpd*.fits' -o -name '*xray-scpd*.fits' -o -name '*xray-vis*.fits' -o -name '*xray-spec*'  \)

l1_uids = []
for f in l1_files:
   *dirs, name = f.split('\\')
    parts = name.split('_')
    uid, tcref = parts[-1].split('-')
    l1_uids.append(uid)

set(lb_uids).difference(set(l1_uids))
{'0074661888',
 '0074661904',
 '2112090002',
 '2203151617',
 '2204028914',
 '2209279737',
 '2209280787',
 '2302120212',
 '2302257105',
 '2304131472'}

@samaloney
Copy link
Collaborator Author

So a further inspection it looks like some (4/10) of the request don't get to level L0 for other reasons the remaining (6/10) are really incomplete packets missing the closing packet.

Valid sets would be {3}, {1, 2}, {0, 1, 2}

for uid in lb_uids:
    file = !find * -name '*{uid}*'
    hdul = fits.open(file[0])
    print(file, set(hdul[1].data['sequence_flag']))

['6/21/solo_LB_stix-21-6-21_0000000000-9999999999_V01_2302120212-60797.fits'] {0, 1}
['6/21/solo_LB_stix-21-6-21_0000000000-9999999999_V01_2209280787-63265.fits'] {0, 1}
['6/21/solo_LB_stix-21-6-21_0000000000-9999999999_V01_2302257105-61109.fits'] {0, 1}
['6/21/solo_LB_stix-21-6-21_0000000000-9999999999_V01_2203151617-62310.fits'] {0, 1, 2}
['6/21/solo_LB_stix-21-6-21_0000000000-9999999999_V01_0074661904-00000.fits'] {0, 1}
['6/21/solo_LB_stix-21-6-21_0000000000-9999999999_V01_2304131472-49403.fits'] {0, 1}
['6/24/solo_LB_stix-21-6-24_0000000000-9999999999_V01_2209279737-62645.fits'] {0, 1, 2}
['6/21/solo_LB_stix-21-6-21_0000000000-9999999999_V01_2112090002-51143.fits'] {0, 1, 2}
['6/21/solo_LB_stix-21-6-21_0000000000-9999999999_V01_2305104430-51218.fits'] {0, 1, 2}
['6/21/solo_LB_stix-21-6-21_0000000000-9999999999_V01_2204028914-63370.fits'] {0, 1}
['6/20/solo_LB_stix-21-6-20_0000000000-9999999999_V01_0074661888-00000.fits'] {0, 1}

@samaloney
Copy link
Collaborator Author

samaloney commented Jun 15, 2023

As a result of above I realised I was combining incomplete sequences and problems processing from LB to L0 so to focus on incomplete sequences I ran this scrip.

Flag Value  Flag Name  Description  
0 Continuation This packet belongs to a longer sequence of TM packets.
1 First This is the first packet of a longer TM sequence. Must be followed by either a continuation or last sequence flag.
2 Last This is the last packet of a longer TM sequence. Must have been preceded by a continuation or fist sequence flag.
3 Stand-alone This packet stands for itself.
for file in lb_files:
    hdul = fits.open(file)
    seq_flag = hdul[1].data['sequence_flag']
    seq_flag_set = set(seq_flag)
    if len(seq_flag) == 1 and seq_flag[0] == 3:  # standalone
        pass
    elif len(seq_flag) == 2 and seq_flag_set == {1, 2}:  # seq with no cont.
        pass
    elif len(seq_flag) > 2 and seq_flag_set == {0, 1, 2}:  # seq with cont.
        pass
    else:
        print(file, seq_flag_set)  # incomplete

./6/24/solo_LB_stix-21-6-24_0000000000-9999999999_V01_2201270032-59177.fits {0, 2}
./6/24/solo_LB_stix-21-6-24_0000000000-9999999999_V01_2201260047-59172.fits {0, 2}
./6/24/solo_LB_stix-21-6-24_0000000000-9999999999_V01_2201270033-59178.fits {0, 2}
./6/20/solo_LB_stix-21-6-20_0000000000-9999999999_V01_0074661888-00000.fits {0, 1}
./6/21/solo_LB_stix-21-6-21_0000000000-9999999999_V01_2204028914-63370.fits {0, 1}
./6/21/solo_LB_stix-21-6-21_0000000000-9999999999_V01_2209280787-63265.fits {0, 1}
./6/21/solo_LB_stix-21-6-21_0000000000-9999999999_V01_0074661904-00000.fits {0, 1}
./6/21/solo_LB_stix-21-6-21_0000000000-9999999999_V01_2302120212-60797.fits {0, 1}
./6/21/solo_LB_stix-21-6-21_0000000000-9999999999_V01_2302257105-61109.fits {0, 1}
./6/21/solo_LB_stix-21-6-21_0000000000-9999999999_V01_2304131472-49403.fits {0, 1}

Complete requests missing L0 files

incomplete = {'0074661888', '0074661904', '2201260047', '2201270032', '2201270033', '2204028914', '2209280787', '2302120212', '2302257105', '2304131472'}
missing_l0 = set(lb_uids).difference(set(l1_uids))
missing_l0.difference(incomplete)
{'2112090002', '2203151617', '2209279737'}

@FredSchuller
Copy link

Is there any chance to recover these data at some point?
For example, I was recently looking for the file with UID 2302120212 and I could not find the L1 file, although the L1A exists (but the content seems to be incomplete, according to the online quick preview)

@samaloney samaloney mentioned this issue Sep 23, 2024
7 tasks
@samaloney samaloney added the investigation investigation label Sep 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
investigation investigation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants