-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 609
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs: Difficulty finding method reference #10161
Comments
Hey @Riezebos -- the reference documentation should definitely rank higher than stuff in release notes. I'm not sure what's happening here because I see the reference page as the first hit, but I'll try to figure out why that's not happening reliably. |
@Riezebos -- can you try searching again on your end? There's a possibility that you got very unlucky and happened to search while our CI was in the middle of updating the search configuration to update the document rankings -- I'd like to rule that out if we can. |
Ah, now it's also at the top for me! Another example that might be different is I can run It is documented on the Duckdb backend page: https://ibis-project.org/backends/duckdb#ibis.backends.duckdb.Backend.to_parquet But when I search for |
Heh, just fixed those missing |
Should be good now @Riezebos ! |
Amazing, that was quick! |
Please describe the issue
As a user getting used to Ibis coming from a Pandas, I often want to find out exactly how a function works.
In many cases, the info is shown when hovering over a method in VSCode, but this doesn't always work as e.g. deferred expressions don't always show all methods that a Column can have.
Today, I was using value_counts and wanted to know whether I could control the name of the column with the count.
Searching the docs gave me:
The place in the docs that I needed turned out to be: https://ibis-project.org/reference/expression-generic.html#ibis.expr.types.generic.Column.value_counts
But in the search menu that page is quite low, and the link in the search doesn't go to the place where that function is defined, as it is used elsewhere in the page as an example.
Would it be possible rank matches from Reference higher in the search results? Or maybe have a separate search box somewhere that can be used to purely search within the Reference?
Code of Conduct
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: