Skip to content

Intel performance libraries #226

Answered by nicgowans
liam-curran asked this question in Q&A
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Hi Liam,

In some AWS testing I did a couple years ago, I found DynAdjust v1.2.3 performed around 2.5 x faster per iteration on a 2.3 GHz Intel Xeon E7-8880 v3 processor compared against a 2.5 GHz AMD EPYC 7000.

In terms of actual iteration times, it was ~1.35 hours on the Intel processor vs ~3.4 hours on the AMD.

Didn't run into any compatibility issues.

Nic

Replies: 1 comment 1 reply

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
@liam-curran
Comment options

Answer selected by liam-curran
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants