Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Changing how coverage is measured to better represent test efficacy. #536

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from
Closed

Changing how coverage is measured to better represent test efficacy. #536

wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

MicahGale
Copy link
Collaborator

@MicahGale MicahGale commented Sep 7, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Description

Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed if applicable. Please also include relevant motivation and context.

Fixes #533

Checklist

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation (if applicable)
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works (if applicable)

@MicahGale MicahGale self-assigned this Sep 8, 2024
@MicahGale MicahGale marked this pull request as ready for review September 8, 2024 18:31
@MicahGale
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I'm not sure if we should implement this yet, or at least not publicly report it.

@MicahGale MicahGale marked this pull request as draft September 10, 2024 12:40
@MicahGale MicahGale closed this Sep 10, 2024
@MicahGale MicahGale mentioned this pull request Sep 11, 2024
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@tjlaboss tjlaboss Awaiting requested review from tjlaboss

Assignees

@MicahGale MicahGale

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Implement Pytest-cov, and make coverage more meaningful
1 participant
@MicahGale