Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RFC 9205 alignment #671

Open
tgeoghegan opened this issue Mar 20, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

RFC 9205 alignment #671

tgeoghegan opened this issue Mar 20, 2025 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@tgeoghegan
Copy link
Collaborator

At the most recent PPM interim, I discussed doing a pass on the document to align with RFC 9205/BCP 56. The most substantial change there is #669, but there's also smaller changes like how we discuss HTTP status codes or use of HTTPS, and I want to track and make those changes separately.

@tgeoghegan tgeoghegan self-assigned this Mar 20, 2025
tgeoghegan added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 20, 2025
In anticipation of some more nuanced changes that are coming for #669,
\#670 and #671, this commit contains various editorial changes I've been
accumulating while doing passes on the document.

The goals are _brevity_ and _clarity_. I've tagged changes
roughly line by line with a justification. Happy reviewing!
tgeoghegan added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 20, 2025
In anticipation of some more nuanced changes that are coming for #669,
\#670 and #671, this commit contains various editorial changes I've been
accumulating while doing passes on the document.

The goals are _brevity_ and _clarity_. I've tagged changes
roughly line by line with a justification. Happy reviewing!
tgeoghegan added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 20, 2025
Edits to the sections on message transport, HPKE config request and
upload request to align with RFC 9205.

- provide examples of requests and responses
- use broadest possible status codes
- refer to RFC 9110 for HTTPS cert validation

Part of #671
@tgeoghegan
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This is in #673, #674, #675

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant