Automated Issue on branch pines

[CodeWatchdog]

journey
title Scores History
section 7a4eac8324ccd06618ecfd2c1421c4ff98d8f095
message: 4: luzmagurzua
vulnerability: 4: luzmagurzua

Loading

[CodeWatchdog]

Commit Review Summary [7a4eac8]

Author	Provided Message	Generated Message	Adherence Score	Comment
@luzmagurzua	'Incorporacion de click en el pin y despliegue de la publicacion'	'Add click event to map pins to show location info'	4 😄	The user-suggested message is clear but could be improved by providing a bit more detail in English for consistency. The generated message focuses on the addition of the click event and the display of location information, which is concise and clear.

Code Complexity

Complexity Comment

The code changes involve adding a new feature to display location information when a map pin is clicked. The majority of the changes are straightforward JavaScript modifications, such as defining constants, initializing the map, and adding event listeners. The use of arrow functions and template literals improves readability. However, the repetition of the map initialization code could be refactored into smaller, reusable functions to enhance maintainability.

Code Vulnerability

Score	Comment
4 😄	There are no immediate vulnerabilities in the code changes. The use of const instead of var reduces the risk of variable re-declaration and scope issues. However, ensure that the location data is sanitized and validated to prevent potential injection attacks. Consider adding error handling for potential issues with the Google Maps API.

SOLID Principles

Principle	Score	Comment
Singleresponsibility	4 😄	The functions generally adhere to the Single Responsibility Principle (SRP). The mostrarInformacionLugar function is well-defined with a single responsibility. However, the initMap function could be further decomposed into smaller functions for better readability and maintenance.
Openclosed	3 😐	The code is open to extension by adding more places, but modifications to the initMap function would be required for significant changes. Consider refactoring the map initialization and marker addition into separate functions or classes to better adhere to the Open/Closed Principle (OCP).
Liskovsubstitution	5 😍	Liskov Substitution Principle (LSP) is not directly applicable here as there is no class inheritance used in the provided code.
Interfacesegregation	5 😍	Interface Segregation Principle (ISP) is not directly applicable as the code does not define any interfaces.
Dependencyinversion	3 😐	The code could better adhere to the Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP) by abstracting the Google Maps API calls. This would allow for easier testing and potential replacement of the map service in the future.