diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 619a4c2..4dd9366 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -10,6 +10,8 @@ For a usage example see the `examples` folder or `src/test.rs`.
 
 ### Benchmarks & Results
 
+<a href="https://bencher.dev/perf/trace4rs?reports_per_page=4&reports_page=1&branches_per_page=8&branches_page=1&testbeds_per_page=8&testbeds_page=1&benchmarks_per_page=8&benchmarks_page=1"><img src="https://api.bencher.dev/v0/projects/trace4rs/perf/img?metric_kinds=6daa0563-984c-40c9-8716-cad463cc693b&branches=7c0ad2df-9b1c-4361-b0a5-8d87f8002dd4&testbeds=15a6cfb2-7ff5-4c89-abe9-d153f08a5ae0&benchmarks=422c918d-bf2f-4470-87b7-f06f6fc854ea%2C6d950af0-8d62-46fa-96e6-f694921e3cb6&title=log4rs+vs+trace4rs" title="log4rs vs trace4rs" alt="log4rs vs trace4rs for trace4rs - Bencher" /></a>
+
 The takeaway is that the actual appenders are roughly equivalent in
 performance. However, when using the `tracing` macros vs the `log` macros
 the appender performance is roughly 2 orders of magnitude larger.