Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Increase coordinate uncertainty for gbif dataset #105

Open
SanderDevisscher opened this issue Jan 16, 2025 · 6 comments · May be fixed by #106
Open

Increase coordinate uncertainty for gbif dataset #105

SanderDevisscher opened this issue Jan 16, 2025 · 6 comments · May be fixed by #106
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@SanderDevisscher
Copy link
Collaborator

Due to a issue with coordinates flagged by Mieke Hoogewijs (via @damianooldoni) I've noticed the coordinate uncertainty is not correct. More precise it still is the value prior to the conversion to 1x1km squares (#91).

This value should be changed.

@damianooldoni what value do you mostly use in case of blurring to 1x1km ?

changes should be implemented here:

occurrence %<>% mutate(dwc_coordinateUncertaintyInMeters = "30")

& here:

occurrence %<>% mutate(dwc_coordinateUncertaintyInMeters = "30")

@SanderDevisscher SanderDevisscher added bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request labels Jan 16, 2025
@SanderDevisscher SanderDevisscher self-assigned this Jan 16, 2025
@damianooldoni
Copy link
Member

@SanderDevisscher: typically we should use the radius of the circle circumscribed a square of 1km x 1km. So, sqrt(2 * 0.5^2). @peterdesmet: is it correct?

@SanderDevisscher
Copy link
Collaborator Author

in meters, so sqrt(2 * 500^2) =~ 707m

SanderDevisscher added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 17, 2025
SanderDevisscher added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 17, 2025
SanderDevisscher added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 17, 2025
SanderDevisscher added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 17, 2025
SanderDevisscher added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 17, 2025
@SanderDevisscher
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Most of the issues are caused by the ponds being in different gridcells, the crossing of several squares happens to pass through that area, see image below:

Image

@damianooldoni
Copy link
Member

Indeed, 707 meters is correct.

I would ask to the partners specifically involved with these occs if you may blurring less than 1x1km. Or not blurring at all 😄 Probably the concerns of few years ago have faded away?

@SanderDevisscher
Copy link
Collaborator Author

It's an issue from late last year 😖

However I've explained the cause of the issue to Mieke and she is going to try and convince the other members of the consortium to do away with the blurring 💪 if she succeeds I need to disable the blurring 🤞

@SanderDevisscher
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Blurring should remain 😢

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants