You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I tried to find employees with names containing doe or test but it doesnt work. I think that the constraint is too strict since managers might want to find two specific employees by their names:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thank you for your input. We acknowledge that HR staff members should be able to find two specific employees by their names, and in actuality, we have indeed implemented that feature in EmployeeManager. As can be seen below for our second example, we can find employees with the names Alex and David by leaving a space between the two keywords while only using one flag.
Items for the Tester to Verify
❓ Issue response
Team chose [response.Rejected]
I disagree
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
❓ Issue severity
Team chose [severity.Low]
Originally [severity.Medium]
I disagree
Reason for disagreement: While I agree that it is my fault for missing out on the example given, I believe that in the case where this was not actually implemented (and was a bug), the severity level of the bug would be a Medium. If the find command only worked for one keyword for each parameter (eg only one name), then it would cause inconvenience for users. Especially in the scenario where the user is trying to search up multiple employees to maybe increment their salaries, the user would have to individually find each employee then increment their salary then repeat for the next employee.
I tried to find employees with names containing
doe
ortest
but it doesnt work. I think that the constraint is too strict since managers might want to find two specific employees by their names:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: