You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Without --ipam-opt="network-name=blue", I could successfully create and delete an address pool on infoblox in the automated manner if corresponding docker network create/rm command is issued.
However, if I add --ipam-opt="network-name=blue" in the docker network create command to have the "Network Name" Extensible Attribute automatically created together with the address pool, the address pool wouldn't be automatically deleted by the docker network rm command (network is successfully deleted in docker nevertheless).
Any thoughts, suggestions?
I'm currently on the master branch, btw.
Cheers
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In this case, since the ipam driver assumes that other docker hosts may be sharing the network, it doesn't delete it from Infoblox. For now, the network on Infoblox need to be deleted manually.
This is something we are aware of and is on the list for future enhancement. Unfortunately, currently, the ReleasePool ipam api does not allow additional option that we could utilize to tell the driver to "forcefully" remove the network.
Guys,
Need you help, thank you in advance!
Without --ipam-opt="network-name=blue", I could successfully create and delete an address pool on infoblox in the automated manner if corresponding docker network create/rm command is issued.
However, if I add --ipam-opt="network-name=blue" in the docker network create command to have the "Network Name" Extensible Attribute automatically created together with the address pool, the address pool wouldn't be automatically deleted by the docker network rm command (network is successfully deleted in docker nevertheless).
Any thoughts, suggestions?
I'm currently on the master branch, btw.
Cheers
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: