A nice parser combinator library for Kotlin JVM, JS, and Multiplatform projects
val booleanGrammar = object : Grammar<BooleanExpression>() {
val id by regexToken("\\w+")
val not by literalToken("!")
val and by literalToken("&")
val or by literalToken("|")
val ws by regexToken("\\s+", ignore = true)
val lpar by literalToken("(")
val rpar by literalToken(")")
val term by
(id use { Variable(text) }) or
(-not * parser(this::term) map { Not(it) }) or
(-lpar * parser(this::rootParser) * -rpar)
val andChain by leftAssociative(term, and) { l, _, r -> And(l, r) }
override val rootParser by leftAssociative(andChain, or) { l, _, r -> Or(l, r) }
}
val ast = booleanGrammar.parseToEnd("a & !b | b & (!a | c)")
dependencies {
implementation("com.github.h0tk3y.betterParse:better-parse:0.4.2")
}
With multiplatform projects, it's OK to add the dependency just to the commonMain
source set, or some other source set if you want it for specific parts of the code.
As many other language recognition tools, better-parse
abstracts away from raw character input by
pre-processing it with a Tokenizer
, that can match Token
s (with regular expressions, literal values or arbitrary
against an input character sequence.
There are several kinds of supported Token
s:
- a
regexToken("(?:my)?(?:regex))
is matched as a regular expression; - a
literalToken("foo")
is matched literally, character to character; - a
token { (charSequence, from) -> ... }
is matched using the passed function.
A Tokenizer
tokenizes an input sequence such as InputStream
or a String
into a Sequence<TokenMatch>
, providing
each with a position in the input.
One way to create a Tokenizer
is to first define the Tokens
to be matched:
val id = regexToken("\\w+")
val cm = literalToken(",")
val ws = regexToken("\\s+", ignore = true)
A
Token
can be ignored by setting itsignore = true
. An ignored token can still be matched explicitly, but if another token is expected, the ignored one is just dropped from the sequence.
val tokenizer = DefaultTokenizer(listOf(id, cm, ws))
Note: the tokens order matters in some cases, because the tokenizer tries to match them in exactly this order. For instance, if
literalToken("a")
is listed beforeliteralToken("aa")
, the latter will never be matched. Be careful with keyword tokens! If you match them with regexes, a word boundary\b
in the end may help against ambiguity.
val tokenMatches: Sequence<TokenMatch> = tokenizer.tokenize("hello, world")
A more convenient way of defining tokens is described in the Grammar section.
It is possible to provide a custom implementation of a Tokenizer
.
A Parser<T>
is an object that accepts an input sequence (TokenMatchesSequence
) and
tries to convert some (from none to all) of its items into a T
. In better-parse
, parsers are also
the building blocks used to create new parsers by combining them.
When a parser tries to process the input, there are two possible outcomes:
-
If it succeeds, it returns
Parsed<T>
containing theT
result and thenextPosition: Int
that points to what it left unprocessed. The latter can then be, and often is, passed to another parser. -
If it fails, it reports the failure returning an
ErrorResult
, which provides detailed information about the failure.
A very basic parser to start with is a Token
itself: given an input TokenMatchesSequence
and a position in it,
it succeeds if the sequence starts with the match of this token itself
(possibly, skipping some ignored tokens) and returns that TokenMatch
, pointing at the next token
with the nextPosition
.
val a = regexToken("a+")
val b = regexToken("b+")
val tokenMatches = DefaultTokenizer(listOf(a, b)).tokenize("aabbaaa")
val result = a.tryParse(tokenMatches, 0) // contains the match for "aa" and the next index is 1 for the match of b
Simpler parsers can be combined to build a more complex parser, from tokens to terms and to the whole language.
There are several kinds of combinators included in better-parse
:
-
map
,use
,asJust
The map combinator takes a successful input of another parser and applies a transforming function to it. The error results are returned unchanged.
val id = regexToken("\\w+") val aText = a map { it.text } // Parser<String>, returns the matched text from the input sequence
A parser for objects of a custom type can be created with
map
:val variable = a map { JavaVariable(name = it.text) } // Parser<JavaVariable>.
-
someParser use { ... }
is amap
equivalent that takes a function with receiver instead. Example:id use { text }
. -
foo asJust bar
can be used to map a parser to some constant value.
-
-
optional(...)
Given a
Parser<T>
, tries to parse the sequence with it, but returns anull
result if the parser failed, and thus never fails itself:val p: Parser<T> = ... val o = optional(p) // Parser<T?>
-
and
,and skip(...)
The tuple combinator arranges the parsers in a sequence, so that the remainder of the first one goes to the second one and so on. If all the parsers succeed, their results are merged into a
Tuple
. If either parser failes, itsErrorResult
is returned by the combinator.val a: Parser<A> = ... val b: Parser<B> = ... val aAndB = a and b // This is a `Parser<Tuple2<A, B>>` val bAndBAndA = b and b and a // This is a `Parser<Tuple3<B, B, A>>`
You can
skip(...)
components in a tuple combinator: the parsers will be called just as well, but their results won't be included in the resulting tuple:val bbWithoutA = skip(a) and b and skip(a) and b and skip(a) // Parser<Tuple2<B, B>>
If all the components in an
and
chain are skipped except for oneParser<T>
, the resulting parser isParser<T>
, notParser<Tuple1<T>>
.To process the resulting
Tuple
, use the aforementionedmap
anduse
. These parsers are equivalent:-
val fCall = id and skip(lpar) and id and skip(rpar) map { (fName, arg) -> FunctionCall(fName, arg) }
-
val fCall = id and lpar and id and rpar map { (fName, _, arg, _) -> FunctionCall(fName, arg) }
-
val fCall = id and lpar and id and rpar use { FunctionCall(t1, t3) }
-
val fCall = id * -lpar * id * -rpar use { FunctionCall(t1, t2) }
(see operators below)
There are
Tuple
classes up toTuple16
and the correspondingand
overloads.There are operator overloads for more compact
and
chains definition:-
a * b
is equivalent toa and b
. -
-a
is equivalent toskip(a)
.
With these operators, the parser
a and skip(b) and skip(c) and d
can also be defined asa * -b * -c * d
. -
-
or
The alternative combinator tries to parse the sequence with the parsers it combines one by one until one succeeds. If all the parsers fail, the returned
ErrorResult
is anAlternativesFailure
instance that contains all the failures from the parsers.The result type for the combined parsers is the least common supertype (which is possibly
Any
).val expr = const or variable or fCall
-
zeroOrMore(...)
,oneOrMore(...)
,N times
,N timesOrMore
,N..M times
These combinators transform a
Parser<T>
into aParser<List<T>>
, invokng the parser several times and failing if there was not enough matches.val modifiers = zeroOrMore(functionModifier) val rectangleParser = 4 times number map { (a, b, c, d) -> Rect(a, b, c, d) }
-
separated(term, separator)
,separatedTerms(term, separator)
,leftAssociative(...)
,rightAssociative(...)
Combines the two parsers, invoking them in turn and thus parsing a sequence of
term
matches separated byseparator
matches.The result is a
Separated<T, S>
which provides the matches of both parsers (note that terms are one more than separators) and can also be reduced in either direction.val number: Parser<Int> = ... val sumParser = separated(number, plus) use { reduce { a, _, b -> a + b } }
The
leftAssociative
andrightAssociative
combinators do exactly this, but they take the reducing operation as they are built:val term: Parser<Term> val andChain = leftAssociative(term, andOperator) { l, _, r -> And(l, r) }
As a convenient way of defining a grammar of a language, there is an abstract class Grammar
, that collects the by
-delegated
properties into a Tokenizer
automatically, and also behaves as a composition of the Tokenizer
and the rootParser
.
Note: a Grammar
also collects by
-delegated Parser<T>
properties so that they can be accessed as
declaredParsers
along with the tokens. As a good style, declare the parsers inside a Grammar
by delegation as well.
interface Item
class Number(val value: Int) : Item
class Variable(val name: String) : Item
class ItemsParser : Grammar<List<Item>>() {
val num by regexToken("\\d+")
val word by regexToken("[A-Za-z]+")
val comma by regexToken(",\\s+")
val numParser by num use { Number(text.toInt()) }
val varParser by word use { Variable(text) }
override val rootParser by separatedTerms(numParser or varParser, comma)
}
val result: List<Item> = ItemsParser().parseToEnd("one, 2, three, 4, five")
To use a parser that has not been constructed yet, reference it with parser { someParser }
or parser(this::someParser)
:
val term by
constParser or
variableParser or
(-lpar and parser(this::term) and -rpar)
A Grammar
implementation can override the tokenizer
property to provide a custom implementation of Tokenizer
.
A Parser<T>
can be converted to another Parser<SyntaxTree<T>>
, where a SyntaxTree<T>
, along with the parsed T
contains the children syntax trees, the reference to the parser and the positions in the input sequence.
This can be done with parser.liftToSyntaxTreeParser()
.
This can be used for syntax highlighting and inspecting the resulting tree in case the parsed result does not contain the full syntactic structure.
For convenience, a Grammar
can also be lifted to that parsing a SyntaxTree
with
grammar.liftToSyntaxTreeGrammar()
.
val treeGrammar = booleanGrammar.liftToSyntaxTreeGrammar()
val tree = treeGrammar.parseToEnd("a & !b | c -> d")
assertTrue(tree.parser == booleanGrammar.implChain)
val firstChild = tree.children.first()
assertTrue(firstChild.parser == booleanGrammar.orChain)
assertTrue(firstChild.range == 0..9)
There are optional arguments for customizing the transformation:
-
LiftToSyntaxTreeOptions
retainSkipped
β whether the resulting syntax tree should include skippedand
components;retainSeparators
β whether theSeparated
combinator parsed separators should be included;
-
structureParsers
β defines the parsers that are retained in the syntax tree; the nodes with parsers that are not in this set are flattened so that their children are attached to their parents in their place.For
Parser<T>
, the default isnull
, which means no nodes are flattened.In case of
Grammar<T>
,structureParsers
defaults to the grammar'sdeclaredParsers
. -
transformer
β a strategy to transform non-built-in parsers. If you define your own combinators and want them to be lifted to syntax tree parsers, pass aLiftToSyntaxTreeTransformer
that will be called on the parsers. When a custom combinator nests another parser, a transformer implementation should calldefault.transform(...)
on that parser.
See SyntaxTreeDemo.kt
for an example of working with syntax trees.
- A boolean expressions parser that constructs a simple AST:
BooleanExpression.kt
- An integer arithmetic expressions evaluator:
ArithmeticsEvaluator.kt
- A toy programming language parser: (link)
- A sample JSON parser by silmeth: (link)
See the benchmarks repository h0tk3y/better-parse-benchmark
and feel free to contribute.