From 7bcc293044018d6b15d3af3a01adf1d8f19eedad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Davide Caratti Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 19:34:15 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] mptcp: refer to 'MPTCP' socket in comments we used to call it 'master' socket at the early stages of MPTCP development, but the correct wording is 'MPTCP' socket opposed to 'TCP subflows': convert the last 3 coments to use a more appropriate term. Signed-off-by: Davide Caratti --- net/mptcp/protocol.c | 4 ++-- net/mptcp/subflow.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c index 8b0a5b74a3b1e2..591939227e8078 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c @@ -2202,7 +2202,7 @@ static int mptcp_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len, if (skb_queue_empty(&msk->receive_queue) && __mptcp_move_skbs(msk)) continue; - /* only the master socket status is relevant here. The exit + /* only the MPTCP socket status is relevant here. The exit * conditions mirror closely tcp_recvmsg() */ if (copied >= target) @@ -3521,7 +3521,7 @@ void mptcp_subflow_process_delegated(struct sock *ssk, long status) static int mptcp_hash(struct sock *sk) { /* should never be called, - * we hash the TCP subflows not the master socket + * we hash the TCP subflows not the MPTCP socket */ WARN_ON_ONCE(1); return 0; diff --git a/net/mptcp/subflow.c b/net/mptcp/subflow.c index 612c38570a6426..39e2cbdf38019c 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/subflow.c +++ b/net/mptcp/subflow.c @@ -1719,7 +1719,7 @@ int mptcp_subflow_create_socket(struct sock *sk, unsigned short family, mptcp_sockopt_sync_locked(mptcp_sk(sk), sf->sk); release_sock(sf->sk); - /* the newly created socket really belongs to the owning MPTCP master + /* the newly created socket really belongs to the owning MPTCP * socket, even if for additional subflows the allocation is performed * by a kernel workqueue. Adjust inode references, so that the * procfs/diag interfaces really show this one belonging to the correct