-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Web Proxy support #256
Comments
Workaround:
|
hi @antoinetran , thanks for the report. I think we can include this in the next release, looks like quite a simple enhancement to be put in. I'm curious, is this a pecularity of your use case? Or just due to a particular setup which you are using to play with interlink? |
I'm not sure I understand, if I rephrase, is-it normal to have a web proxy in our environment? Yes, it is quite the standard in lots of environments to have internet only through a corporate proxy. I expect the interlink to get its token through the web proxy for test purpose, although I would have like it to not rely on internet at all. |
The only requirement for internet is at the authentication level b/w the cluster and the remote interlink server. If you have an oauth2 compatible identity provider inside your corporate perimeter is just as fine as using github. The alternative (not coming in 0.3, but probably in 0.4) is to use x509 certs. The purpose of the question was a bit different though, I just wanted to know more about your use case (at large) to understand how we can help. |
No problem, let me answer you in private by email :) |
Short Description of the issue
In a closed network environment, with internet access only though a authenticated web proxy, the interlink deployment fails.
Environment
Steps to reproduce
Logs, stacktrace, or other symptoms
No token because no internet.
Summary of proposed changes
Add in ~/.interlink.yaml, a config like this:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: