You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I also posted this in the discussions section (#1255), but the difference between how this works when I specify the fields vs. when I use "include all", makes me believe that this isn't intended behavior. Something similar was also perceived as a bug/regression in #795.
I'm having some problems getting the filter fields in alphabetic order. That is, I'm having problems when I'm using "include all" like this:
I expect that the filter fields are rendered in alphabetical order, regardless of if I specify the fields I want to be included or if I specify to include all existing fields.
Steps to Reproduce
Adding the following in a config-file under defaults or for a specific service.
Looks like I was wrong about the filter fields being sorted if I specify fields. The filter fields order seems to be decided by the property order in the provider. Anyway, it seems like there's been a regression again (as mentioned in #795 and addressed in #848), so unless there's a workaround, I'll probably postpone the upgrade to v4.x, hoping it will be resolved.
ldproxy Version
3.6.1.
Current Behavior
I also posted this in the discussions section (#1255), but the difference between how this works when I specify the fields vs. when I use "include all", makes me believe that this isn't intended behavior. Something similar was also perceived as a bug/regression in #795.
I'm having some problems getting the filter fields in alphabetic order. That is, I'm having problems when I'm using "include all" like this:
If I specify what fields I want to include, e.g.:
included:
the filter fields are sorted.
Expected Behavior
I expect that the filter fields are rendered in alphabetical order, regardless of if I specify the fields I want to be included or if I specify to include all existing fields.
Steps to Reproduce
Adding the following in a config-file under defaults or for a specific service.
Relevant log output
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: