Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should we start checking for PQC ? #1640

Open
mdavids opened this issue Jan 28, 2025 · 3 comments
Open

Should we start checking for PQC ? #1640

mdavids opened this issue Jan 28, 2025 · 3 comments
Labels
discuss Requires further team discussion and decisions
Milestone

Comments

@mdavids
Copy link

mdavids commented Jan 28, 2025

Maybe don't assign a score to it yet - but already start checking?

Possibly relevant:

https://www.ncsc.nl/documenten/publicaties/2022/juli/guidelines-for-quantum-safe-transport-layer-encryption/guidelines-for-quantum-safe-transport-layer-encryption

@bwbroersma bwbroersma added the discuss Requires further team discussion and decisions label Jan 28, 2025
@bwbroersma bwbroersma added this to the intake milestone Jan 28, 2025
@bwbroersma
Copy link
Collaborator

bwbroersma commented Jan 28, 2025

Version 1.0, May 2022. This information is not legally binding. It is to be updated yearly.

👀 How should I read this?

Seems to be only one (one-off?) publication in English and no Dutch version, it's linked from the Dutch news article "NCSC publiceert beveiligingsrichtlijnen voor kwantumveilige transportlaag encryptie" by NCSC-NL, 2022-07-06T12:06.

@mdavids
Copy link
Author

mdavids commented Jan 31, 2025

Since we follow NCSC guidelines for testing I was hoping they had something on PQC, but it's not much. Meanwhile, PQC-algo's are being deployed (like for instance on Cloudflare) and it is a 'hot' topic. That is why I wanted to bring it up anyway.

Image

@bwbroersma
Copy link
Collaborator

bwbroersma commented Jan 31, 2025

These are all still draft RFC's right? E.g. draft-kwiatkowski-tls-ecdhe-mlkem.

Maybe some PQC will land in the TLS guidelines, if so, this can be checked.

Related:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
discuss Requires further team discussion and decisions
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants