Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release version compatible with Julia v1+ #7

Open
nickrobinson251 opened this issue Aug 28, 2019 · 6 comments
Open

Release version compatible with Julia v1+ #7

nickrobinson251 opened this issue Aug 28, 2019 · 6 comments

Comments

@nickrobinson251
Copy link
Contributor

We may want to do #6 first, and possibly need #5 as well before it's really usable... but I vote we tag a release

@nickrobinson251
Copy link
Contributor Author

i guess this is really just a question for @iamed2, since this package is their good work

@bjarthur
Copy link

closed by 8e38292 ?

@nickrobinson251
Copy link
Contributor Author

That updated the syntax, but there's been no released of the package since (which is what this issue tracks)

I don't think this package is even registered in the General registry

And i don't know if anyone if interested in this package existing enough to maintain it 😅

@nickrobinson251
Copy link
Contributor Author

A more performant thread-safe read-write lock exists in ConcurrentUtilities.jl: https://github.com/JuliaServices/ConcurrentUtilities.jl/blob/v2.2.1/src/rwlock.jl

@nickrobinson251
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc @iamed2

@iamed2
Copy link
Member

iamed2 commented Jul 29, 2023

Yeah seems like that rwlock implementation is better?

This is indeed not registered, and won't be. License is MIT and forks are welcome if anyone wants to build off this, but it does seem like ConcurrentUtilities.jl is better in every way.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants