-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 59
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
coverage_content_type #591
Comments
Great catch. We do actually check that but we probably created that list from here, where there is the same misspelling you're reporting: http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Attribute_Convention_for_Data_Discovery_1-3#coverage_content_type For reference |
Or is the misspelling is actually on the ISO end? I don't think auxillary is a word. |
That's right. How should this be resolved, then? Personally, I think we should keep it the way it has been spelled in the ISO document. |
I suppose it would be prudent to let someone know of the misspelling and inconsistency between ESIP site and the ISO document. Not sure exactly who to talk to. @jbosch-noaa any ideas? One option is we could accept both spellings in the compliance checker. |
I have sent an email to the ESIP mailing list. Will wait for folks to weigh in. |
Maybe @amilan17 has some insight into it. Most NOAA metadata seems to refer to the ISO Codelists hosted at NCEI (formerly NGDC at these URLs: https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/emma/xsd/schema/resources/Codelist/gmxCodelists.xml#MD_CoverageContentTypeCode ) as linked from the GEO-IDE wiki, but I know these are in the process of moving to a new home/URL. But perhaps this error is in the official ISO codelists as well, not just the NOAA ones, I honestly don't know where to find those offhand. |
I found an official copy of the ISO 19115-1 document and I see the typo in it as well. |
Have any conclusions been reached regarding the accepted values? |
The ACDD 1.3 check currently does not validate the coverage_content_type attribute values against the controlled codelist at
https://geo-ide.noaa.gov/wiki/index.php?title=ISO_19115_and_19115-2_CodeList_Dictionaries#MD_CoverageContentTypeCode
Some of the files that I tested had the coverage_content_type listed as "auxiliaryInformation" and those still passed the check
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: