You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The learning goals in the English version are written like chapter headings, for example
LG 6-1: Understand the API Lifecycle
LG 6-2: Manage APIs as Products
LG 6-3: Know API Lifecycle Tooling
This looks reasonable in the chapters, but not in the list of learning objectives at the beginning, where they are simply placed one below the other. I would therefore write them with small letters at the beginning of the words.
LG 6-1: Understand the API lifecycle
LG 6-2: Manage APIs as products
LG 6-3: Know API lifecycle tooling
At least that's how we did it in the SOFT translation. But perhaps it's also a matter of taste and definitely not super important.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Since I was the one writing those my vote clearly is for title case. But whether these are titles or not certainly is up for discussion. I'll defer to the majority opinion on that one.
Weirdly, GitHub issues cannot have polls, but discussions can. Should I create a poll in a discussion and link it from here?
The learning goals in the English version are written like chapter headings, for example
LG 6-1: Understand the API Lifecycle
LG 6-2: Manage APIs as Products
LG 6-3: Know API Lifecycle Tooling
This looks reasonable in the chapters, but not in the list of learning objectives at the beginning, where they are simply placed one below the other. I would therefore write them with small letters at the beginning of the words.
LG 6-1: Understand the API lifecycle
LG 6-2: Manage APIs as products
LG 6-3: Know API lifecycle tooling
At least that's how we did it in the SOFT translation. But perhaps it's also a matter of taste and definitely not super important.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: