Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor Codeql Action and Workflows #123

Open
ejcsid opened this issue Feb 6, 2025 · 1 comment · May be fixed by it-at-m/refarch-templates#860 or it-at-m/lhm_actions#25
Open

Refactor Codeql Action and Workflows #123

ejcsid opened this issue Feb 6, 2025 · 1 comment · May be fixed by it-at-m/refarch-templates#860 or it-at-m/lhm_actions#25
Assignees

Comments

@ejcsid
Copy link
Contributor

ejcsid commented Feb 6, 2025

Check if refactoring CodeQL Action is possible so that .github/.github/workflows/codeql.yml can be eliminated. At the moment worfklow calls are made like this:

.github/workflow-templates/codeql.yml -> .github/.github/workflows/codeql.yml -> .github/.github/actions/action-codeql/action.yml

See also it-at-m/lhm_actions#8 (comment)

@ejcsid ejcsid added this to SPS Feb 6, 2025
@ejcsid ejcsid converted this from a draft issue Feb 6, 2025
@hupling
Copy link
Collaborator

hupling commented Mar 5, 2025

Image

also man muss das dann alles so einzeln rüberschieben, ähnlich wie bei maven release,

@devtobi passt das so?

@hupling hupling linked a pull request Mar 6, 2025 that will close this issue
@hupling hupling linked a pull request Mar 6, 2025 that will close this issue
@hupling hupling self-assigned this Mar 6, 2025
@hupling hupling linked a pull request Mar 6, 2025 that will close this issue
@hupling hupling linked a pull request Mar 6, 2025 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Todo
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants