You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Dear maintainers,
We are currently developing a verifier and working towards compatibility with the IT wallet. While going through the specifications, I noticed some points that could use clarification:
1. Purpose of the scope Parameter
The current documentation suggests the use of the scope parameter alongside the presentation_definitionand an incompatibility with presentation_definition_uri. This raises a question:
What is the purpose of the scope parameter if a presentation_definition is already defined?
It seems redundant, as the presentation_definition appears sufficient for defining the requirements for verifiable presentations.
2. Mapping Between scope and presentation_definition
The documentation does not provide any guidance on how the mapping between scope and presentation_definition should be established. Specifically:
Is there any detailed guidance or specification on how to map the scope parameter to the presentation_definition?
This aspect seems to be outside the scope of the OID4VP specification (reference) but appears to be a critical integration point for compatibility with the IT wallet.
References:
IT Wallet Documentation: Request URI Response
OID4VP Specification: Using Scope Parameter
I would appreciate clarification or additional documentation on these points to ensure alignment with the intended implementation approach.
Thank you for your support and for maintaining this project!
Best regards,
Juba
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dear maintainers,
We are currently developing a verifier and working towards compatibility with the IT wallet. While going through the specifications, I noticed some points that could use clarification:
1. Purpose of the scope Parameter
The current documentation suggests the use of the
scope
parameter alongside thepresentation_definition
and an incompatibility withpresentation_definition_uri
. This raises a question:What is the purpose of the
scope
parameter if apresentation_definition
is already defined?It seems redundant, as the presentation_definition appears sufficient for defining the requirements for verifiable presentations.
2. Mapping Between scope and presentation_definition
The documentation does not provide any guidance on how the mapping between
scope
andpresentation_definition
should be established. Specifically:presentation_definition
?This aspect seems to be outside the scope of the OID4VP specification (reference) but appears to be a critical integration point for compatibility with the IT wallet.
References:
IT Wallet Documentation: Request URI Response
OID4VP Specification: Using Scope Parameter
I would appreciate clarification or additional documentation on these points to ensure alignment with the intended implementation approach.
Thank you for your support and for maintaining this project!
Best regards,
Juba
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: