You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Dear authors,
Thanks for your great work!
I fine-tuned a VL-T5 model on Refcocog, based on your released checkpoint but got a bad result: 20.45407
I noticed that in your paper the VL-BART diverges but not VL-T5.
Could you help take a look?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dear authors, Thanks for your great work! I fine-tuned a VL-T5 model on Refcocog, based on your released checkpoint but got a bad result: 20.45407 I noticed that in your paper the VL-BART diverges but not VL-T5. Could you help take a look?
Thanks!
Do you mind if you could share how do you inference on the model of the refcocog? Thanks
Hi, in case you used args.vis_pointer=True in your experiment, would you please try with args.vis_pointer=False, that I made default recently here? I could reproduce the results in the paper with the current codebase.
Dear authors,
Thanks for your great work!
I fine-tuned a VL-T5 model on Refcocog, based on your released checkpoint but got a bad result:
20.45407
I noticed that in your paper the VL-BART diverges but not VL-T5.
Could you help take a look?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: