You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the case that a package needs to be required with a different name than the recipe and/or multiple times, it would be nice to have a syntax to do so.
It's a bit weird to integrate this kind of behavior with the current syntax of the quse-package macro, but I have a couple ideas.
Introduce a cond-like section of the macro. But I wouldn't want to overwrite any names.
Add a second macro to the package, something like multiquse-package, which would take a single recipe and several cond-like branches with package names/use-package forms.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
See https://github.com/jaccarmac/dot-emacs-dot-d/blob/e8f0b1fad81d82d6952f214396f67d1fce096ee3/init.el#L150-L153 for an example of what I consider to be bad syntax.
In the case that a package needs to be
require
d with a different name than the recipe and/or multiple times, it would be nice to have a syntax to do so.It's a bit weird to integrate this kind of behavior with the current syntax of the
quse-package
macro, but I have a couple ideas.cond
-like section of the macro. But I wouldn't want to overwrite any names.multiquse-package
, which would take a single recipe and severalcond
-like branches with package names/use-package
forms.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: