Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

xml2ly: emit warning for ignored pedal change tag #9

Open
lemzwerg opened this issue Mar 27, 2024 · 6 comments
Open

xml2ly: emit warning for ignored pedal change tag #9

lemzwerg opened this issue Mar 27, 2024 · 6 comments

Comments

@lemzwerg
Copy link

[ef5018a]

Consider the MusicXML file in the attached archive and process it with

xml2ly pedal-change.xml > pedal-change.ly

xml2ly correctly ignores the <pedal type="change"/> element. I suggest to emit a warning accordingly.

pedal-change.zip

@jacques-menu
Copy link
Owner

jacques-menu commented Mar 27, 2024 via email

@lemzwerg
Copy link
Author

Jacques, I wish you the same!

Please consider LilyPond's MusicXML test suite and compare the output of xml2ly with other programs that have good MusicXML support (I guess this means Dorico, Finale, and Sibelius).

Note, however, that the test suite covers MusicXML 1.0, which is very old. It would be great if this could be updated to a newer standard version...

@jacques-menu
Copy link
Owner

jacques-menu commented Mar 28, 2024 via email

@lemzwerg
Copy link
Author

I'm not acquainted with MusicXML at all; I'm just looking at bug reports in LilyPond's issue tracker 🙂 This means I have no idea whether there exists a script to convert from older MusicXML versions to newer ones – that is, without 'enriching' the original files with product-specific things (say, by using Finale to import the old MusicXML file, then exporting it again).

Regarding TeXLive actions for GitHub: I suggest that you write to the [email protected] mailing list and ask for guidance.

@lemzwerg
Copy link
Author

BTW, I have to correct myself: The MusicXML test suite is for version 2.0, not version 1.0 – at least it uses elements and tags of version 2.0, according to https://www.w3.org/2021/06/musicxml40/version-history/20/

I probably should update the DOCTYPE comment in all files...

@jacques-menu
Copy link
Owner

jacques-menu commented Mar 28, 2024 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants