Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OT Failures #8

Open
kirkilj opened this issue Jul 12, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

OT Failures #8

kirkilj opened this issue Jul 12, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@kirkilj
Copy link

kirkilj commented Jul 12, 2023

Hi Jason,

The README states that "The DITA-OT Swagger plug-in has been tested against DITA-OT 3.x.

However, your mentioning how to install DITA 4.0 in the next few paragraphs.

Ever since we upgraded our Docker image to use Java 11 and OT 3.7.4, any use of a topicref with format="swagger" fails. It's been running just fine for a couple years prior to that.

Are there any other compatibility issues which we should be aware of? It looks like you updated some dependencies recently, so were they related to compatibility with DITA 4.x? We plan to move to 4.1 in our next release of our internal pipeline, but for the moment we're running on 3.7.4.

I noticed that you made changes last week to some dependencies, but you haven't issued a new release.

@kirkilj kirkilj changed the title OT Compatibility OT Failures Jul 12, 2023
@jason-fox
Copy link
Owner

The plugin is was originally written and should work with DITA-OT 3.x - that is part of the original README.

The plugin is regularly updated to run against latest DITA-OT. So far it is usually just the tests and test dependencies that have needed to be updated - for example when a PanDoc release alters the HTML. Since I'm only testing this against latest DITA-OT 4.x I would always recommend that version.

Since I'm not regularly re-testing against DITA-OT 3.x I couldn't guarantee against regression errors, but the best formatting will occur with a 4.x engine.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants