You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I made some rough test on my NAS, an ARMv5TE based device without neither FPU nor NEON extensions, especially slow on media processing.
I'm trying to optimize thumbnail generation, but I wonder why benchmarks are comparing jpegtran to the resize method of PIL, that's really slow, instead of comparing with the thumbnail method of PIL, that's a lot faster.
In my brief testcase I found a smaller difference in performance: jpegtran seem around 20-30% faster but with worse quality, at least at first glance..
So I wonder if you made some benchmarking involving also PIL thumbnail.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I made some rough test on my NAS, an ARMv5TE based device without neither FPU nor NEON extensions, especially slow on media processing.
I'm trying to optimize thumbnail generation, but I wonder why benchmarks are comparing jpegtran to the
resize
method of PIL, that's really slow, instead of comparing with thethumbnail
method of PIL, that's a lot faster.In my brief testcase I found a smaller difference in performance: jpegtran seem around 20-30% faster but with worse quality, at least at first glance..
So I wonder if you made some benchmarking involving also PIL
thumbnail
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: