You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Our current logic assumes that i/j correspond to x/y respectively. I just found an example dataset where that does not seem to be the case: 'CMIP.CMCC.CMCC-ESM2.historical.r1i1p1f1.Omon.tos.gn.gs://cmip6/CMIP6/CMIP/CMCC/CMCC-ESM2/historical/r1i1p1f1/Omon/tos/gn/v20210114/
I am wondering if this is faulty metadata for this particular dataset or if we need to revise our assumption here that e.g. i is always the label of the nominal east-west direction (which I am pretty sure x is in other datasets`).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Our current logic assumes that
i
/j
correspond tox
/y
respectively. I just found an example dataset where that does not seem to be the case:'CMIP.CMCC.CMCC-ESM2.historical.r1i1p1f1.Omon.tos.gn.gs://cmip6/CMIP6/CMIP/CMCC/CMCC-ESM2/historical/r1i1p1f1/Omon/tos/gn/v20210114/
I am wondering if this is faulty metadata for this particular dataset or if we need to revise our assumption here that e.g.
i
is always the label of the nominal east-west direction (which I am pretty surex
is in other datasets`).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: