Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Thank you for the report. I'll push a commit shortly to fix this. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello,
I seem to have a case where a datetime with precision is not correctly being identified as a datetime. ActiveRecord was used for migrations only in this legacy project - Sequel is used in the code base and the db is Aurora MySQL. The code that breaks with this upgrade hasn't been touched in 4+ years.
Migration:
Schema entry:
When I run:
5.29.0 (Passes)
5.32.0 + (Fails)
Note that the
:type
field is:datetime
in the passing case andnil
in the failing case. All, timestamps and datetimes without precision continue to work in this project as expected.It seems like this commit is related to this case and makes me think that it should still be correctly populating the type: 3c5036d
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions