v1.0

[AlexCuse]

• kill 3.5 support (helps with Squishit.less adds C# file to VB project #232)
• ajaxmin / yui upgrade (Support AjaxMin 5.1 and YUICompressor.NET 2.3.0 #261)
• preprocessor bootstrapping to work with VB (Squishit.less adds C# file to VB project #232)
• cleanup temp files on shutdown
• remove closure compiler (Remove Closure Minifier from Core (SquishIt.Framework) #266)
• use YUI minifiers by default (SquishIt can't minify e5-shim #313, Squishit ignores Bootstrap 3.3.0 stylesheet #304, many others)
• hide all dependencies on system.web from main framework (Loosen System.Web Stranglehold #315)
• update dotless (update dotless? #317)
• update coffeescript (update coffeescript to latest version #328)
• update jurassic (upgrade jurassic #330)
• package restructuring - SquishIt.Framework, SquishIt.AspNet. Current SquishIt package should probably deliver both of those

[AlexCuse]

probably may as well go .net 4.5 at this point

[YodasMyDad]

Is there an ETA for v1?

[AlexCuse]

I'm hoping to have a beta release out after new years. There's a lot of changes coming from 3.5 that I still need to make sense of, but I have some time over the next couple weeks.

[AlexCuse]

I just pushed a beta 1 release to nuget: https://www.nuget.org/packages/SquishIt/1.0.0-beta1

This breaks 3.5 support.

Also adds WebActivator as a reference, which should allow preprocessors to be self-registering and allow the framework assembly to clean up any temp files created when resolving embedded resources.

It also switches the default minifiers from AjaxMin to YUI - this change I might back out, not certain at this point.

It also has a change that I guess I need to push to 0.9.8.1 that will create directories as needed for output files (inheriting from the parent folder permissions). This eliminates the need to create all of your output folders on server prior to deployment.

[Worthaboutapig]

Do you have anyone to take up #315? I'd be willing to look at it, using both SquishIt and Nancy and trying to get these running on Mono.

[AlexCuse]

I was starting to see that as a 1.1 feature, just because of my lack of experience w/ Nancy @Worthaboutapig. If you want to look at the Nancy side of things I can probably get you the necessary extensibility points this week though. I looked at this when creating the issue and don't think it was too awful. The main question I had was how best to deliver the aspnet specific bits, and whether or not a new nuget package would be necessary (I'd like to avoid that if possible, to minimize disruption)

[Worthaboutapig]

@AlexCuse I've made some comments on #315, but I'm happy to start as soon as you like.