Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Inteoperability OpenDDS and RustDDS #350

Open
muhamadnaufalA opened this issue Oct 4, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Inteoperability OpenDDS and RustDDS #350

muhamadnaufalA opened this issue Oct 4, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@muhamadnaufalA
Copy link

Hello, sorry if my question is just a simple question, because I am new at DDS (beginner)

here my question:

why when I try to do interoperability between OpenDDS (C++) and RustDDS (where RustDDS is the publisher and OpenDDS is the subscriber), QoS rules do not apply...

for example:

  • If the publisher (RustDDS) has this QoS:
    image

  • then, the subscriber (OpenDDS C++) has this QoS:
    image

why is data from the publisher still sent to the subscriber (even though the publisher's QoS is lower than the subscriber.)

*Note:
As far as I know, this is a QoS rule that must be applied.
image

thank you...

@jhelovuo jhelovuo self-assigned this Oct 7, 2024
@jhelovuo
Copy link
Owner

jhelovuo commented Oct 7, 2024

Hello,

I do not know why QoS rules do not work in your case. They should work like you expect.

In other cases they do work, e.g. set up eProsima Shapes Demo program to subscribe to topic Square with reliability=reliable:

From RustDDS source directory, run

  • Reliable publisher: $ cargo run --example=shapes_demo -- -P -r -t Square --> Blue square is received and shown by eProsima Shapes Demo. RustDDS reports DataWriter status: PublicationMatched ...
  • Best-Effort publisher: $ cargo run --example=shapes_demo -- -P -b -t Square --> RustDDS complains QoS mismatch Reliability topic="Square". eProsima Shapes Demo does not react.

Please provide some minimal example programs to reproduce the problem you are seeing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants