You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
emacs --version
GNU Emacs 31.0.50
Development version a13eef1fae00 on master branch; build date 2024-09-04.
Copyright (C) 2024 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GNU Emacs comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.
You may redistribute copies of GNU Emacs
under the terms of the GNU General Public License.
For more information about these matters, see the file named COPYING.
:$ uname -a
Linux fig.sgc.loc 4.18.0-553.22.1.el8_10.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Sep 25 09:20:43 UTC 2024 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
and I find byte-compiling makes a HUGE difference in startup time (at least)
(FWIW: I built emacs --with-native-compilation=aot)
BTW: since I am not using homebrew (and so don't have cask), I compiled the .el files with:
make compile CASK_EXEC=
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for noting this. I will have to give it a try. it is try i don't usually do it, and performance is "good enough" "most of the time"... The startup time isn't that critical for me, ideally emacs is open days at at time or longer. but, there are times I would certainly appreciate snappier performance! especially when org-db is indexing files...
@jkitchin elsewhere wrote I usually don't use byte-compiled files myself
I am installing scimax following Linux users
using
and I find byte-compiling makes a HUGE difference in startup time (at least)
(FWIW: I built emacs --with-native-compilation=aot)
BTW: since I am not using homebrew (and so don't have
cask
), I compiled the .el files with:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: