Consider removing the 4 dimmest stars

[johanley]

In using this data in a project, the following 4 dim objects were absent from the stars being presented in a chart.
The limiting mag was 5.02, and these 4 are dimmer than that limit.

5737,Psc,0.3267406477984586,0.13423509176668205,5.21,ζ Psc,,0.145,-0.055689999999999996,0.018760000000000002,15.0,7344
5131,Psc,0.2917595786292615,0.3768249010178581,5.33,ψ1 Psc,,0.04449,-0.01482,0.011859999999999999,-3.9,6456
62223,,3.3430022443806533,0.7909882198052244,5.42,,,-0.0014,0.01324,0.00312,15.3,110914 Cvn
40817,Vol,2.18052116868656,-1.2493911111212248,5.33,κ1 Vol,,-0.016890000000000002,0.03626,0.0075,36.0,71046

All except 62223 are doubles that get a boosted magnitude when combined with a close companion.

If these 4 are removed, then the dimmest star referenced in the constellation lines will be mag 5.02 (according to Hipparcos Vmag data).