Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

**06/14/2017 upgrade notice** #12

Open
jonmatifa opened this issue Jun 15, 2017 · 3 comments
Open

**06/14/2017 upgrade notice** #12

jonmatifa opened this issue Jun 15, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@jonmatifa
Copy link
Owner

If you are upgrading your zfs manager to the latest git pull (as of June 14th 2017), you may run into some issues displaying the ZFS pools and ZFS filesystems lists correctly, namely you may not get a list that includes any properties, just the names. I made a change that allows for customizing those lists, which means the config file needs to be updated.

You can edit the config at /etc/webmin/zfsmanager/config and add the following two lines:

list_zpool=size,alloc,free,frag,cap,dedup,health
list_zfs=used,avail,refer,mountpoint

Incidentally, you can customize these lists by adding/removing/rearranging comma delimited properties respective for each. It's the equivalent of running the zpool list -o or zfs list -o commands.

@abclution
Copy link

abclution commented Jun 15, 2017 via email

@jonmatifa
Copy link
Owner Author

jonmatifa commented Jun 20, 2017

abclution see issue #13, I think it may relate to the problems you're describing.

@jonmatifa
Copy link
Owner Author

See above*

Did you have it installed previously? Those lines are in the config file, but will only update the template one located under the webmin root (such as /usr/share/webmin/zfsmanager) rather than the current running config out at /etc/webmin/zfsmanager/

I suppose I could add a function to validate the config and add in missing parameters as needed...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants