We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
First: thanks for the awesome work you're doing.
I have a feature request:
In some fields of science (e.g. computer science, e.g. this paper) large numbers without units are often abbreviated using the kilo prefix.
Examples:
After 21k iterations, the loop was terminated.
There are possible workarounds:
\documentclass{article} \usepackage{siunitx} \DeclareSIUnit\k{k} \begin{document} After \SI{21}{\k} iterations, the loop was terminated \end{document}
\documentclass{article} \usepackage{siunitx} \begin{document} After \SI{21}{\kilo{}} iterations, the loop was terminated. \end{document}
However, both seem hacky and not very elegant.
I would much more prefer a solution like: \num{21k} or \num[k-notation = true]{21000}
\num{21k}
\num[k-notation = true]{21000}
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
First: thanks for the awesome work you're doing.
I have a feature request:
In some fields of science (e.g. computer science, e.g. this paper) large numbers without units are often abbreviated using the kilo prefix.
Examples:
There are possible workarounds:
However, both seem hacky and not very elegant.
I would much more prefer a solution like:
\num{21k}
or\num[k-notation = true]{21000}
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: