-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Idea for overhaul #42
Comments
Closed
This was referenced Sep 27, 2023
To add some feedback on DX for a newcoming :
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I've kept saying in several places that we may need to re-design this library from scratch.
A bit of context: https://blog.axlight.com/posts/you-might-not-need-react-query-for-jotai/
I thought,
const [dataAtom, statusAtom] = atomsWithQuery(...)
was a nice hack, but it's not nice in DX. The library impl is also complicated.The mismatch is still there. We have several issues reported. In fact,
jotai-urql
is overhauled due to the same reason.So, the general idea is to re-design the binding api fully from the TanStack Query perspective.
I can help from the Jotai perspective, but we need someone with TanStack Query background to maintain this project.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: