You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This issue is meant to serve as a discussion. A recent workshop attendee suggested rethinking how citations are tracked for the library. Instead of relying exclusively on the BRM paper as a canonical citation, DOIs could be assigned to plugins and versions individually. The benefit is that it will be easier for contributors to be recognized through academic citations.
This change would fit in the larger goal of modularizing the codebase (#195, #529). Suggestions on how to do this are welcome.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This issue is meant to serve as a discussion. A recent workshop attendee suggested rethinking how citations are tracked for the library. Instead of relying exclusively on the BRM paper as a canonical citation, DOIs could be assigned to plugins and versions individually. The benefit is that it will be easier for contributors to be recognized through academic citations.
This change would fit in the larger goal of modularizing the codebase (#195, #529). Suggestions on how to do this are welcome.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: