Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

https://github.com/jupyter/jupyter_events needs maintenance. #84

Open
Carreau opened this issue Dec 17, 2024 · 6 comments
Open

https://github.com/jupyter/jupyter_events needs maintenance. #84

Carreau opened this issue Dec 17, 2024 · 6 comments
Assignees

Comments

@Carreau
Copy link

Carreau commented Dec 17, 2024

It has been breaking downstream projects (including jupyter_server CI) for some time due to deprecation and various other issues.

I'll try to spend a few hours on it as I can; but it will need a long term maintenance plan.

@Carreau
Copy link
Author

Carreau commented Dec 17, 2024

I fixed the critical things and published a new release because it was critical and I was able to afford the few hours; but having regular monitoring of issues/PRs on this package and other woudl be a good thing.

@jasongrout
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @Carreau! What subproject council do you think is responsible for this repo?

@Carreau
Copy link
Author

Carreau commented Dec 17, 2024

I don't know. The only visible maintainer is @Zsailer ; as AFAICT from the PR it affect jupyter-server and jupyter-lab.

I did a 0.11 release to fix some failing CI in jupyter-server, but I might yank it as it seem to have deep reaching consequences.

In general I think there should be tools to check the mapping activity of GH-repos, to pypi packages, and a file that describe who should be responsible to check and maybe auto-open issues here if a repo seem unmaintained.

@afshin
Copy link
Contributor

afshin commented Dec 17, 2024

I would propose this project be part of Jupyter Server.

@Zsailer
Copy link
Contributor

Zsailer commented Dec 17, 2024

I would propose this project be part of Jupyter Server.

I agree. I will trigger the transfer by opening a vote with the team.

I fixed the critical things and published a new release because it was critical and I was able to afford the few hours; but having regular monitoring of issues/PRs on this package and other woudl be a good thing.

Thank you, Matthias. I appreciate your time here. I'm in the same boat—doing my best to contribute/maintain this project when I get space/time. We do track this in the Jupyter Server meeting, but it's fallen through the cracks.

@Carreau
Copy link
Author

Carreau commented Dec 18, 2024

We do track this in the Jupyter Server meeting

I believe that's where there should be some tooling, like a single place with all the repo "last activity", time since last publication on PyPI (if relevant) ... etc.

This is the kind of things that typically are easier with a single org as you can view all repos of an org e.g: https://github.com/orgs/jupyter-server/repositories which you can now sort by "last push" etc.

And also not having to transfer repositories and changing all urls is also one more reaosns to stop have 21+ orgs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants