-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Who is interested in collaborating with NFDI around spawning user sessions across multiple clusters? #644
Comments
https://github.com/yuvipanda/jupyterhub-multicluster-kubespawner is my take on this. I'd love for us to find funding to finish this. Ah sorry i see you have already linked it :D |
Hey everyone, thanks for your help & thoughts on this! Let's stay in contact on this! |
Hey, @yuvipanda that's a cool Spawner. But we also want to start JupyterLabs on HPC Systems (and possibly other things, too). That's why we need a more generic approach. |
@kreuzert I just took a quick look at outpost and I think I love this model! I am going to try to find some time to dive into it some more, and if it works out I'll probably archive my repo and point people to outpost. |
@yuvipanda |
In a recent collaboration cafe we had a presentation from a team at NFDI that is building out a JupyterHub service across much of Germany. @arnim and several others were represented here (Arnim can you cc others as you wish?).
They are interested in enhancing JupyterHub's ability to spawn user sessions across many clusters and/or hubs, so that a single hub could be the launching point for multiple other hubs, potentially in many other clusters.
In the meeting, we agreed that some pieces of this functionality could be beneficial to build into JupyterHub or Z2JH, as many communities want the ability to spawn user sessions across different kinds of infrastructure. @minrk noted that we could try to align on a canonical implementation that JupyterHub recommends, developed in partnership with the NFDI team, and they could then build on top of it for their service. I think @consideRatio and @MridulS were also interested.
Question: who is interested in this?
References
BackendSpawner
implementationThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: