-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 339
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow developers to override built-in chat commands #507
Comments
I was surprised to see that this was left out of #398. I really looked forward to the ability to fully customise the slash commands and viewing the PR in early phases I understood that it will enable that. I would like to quote @Zsailer suggestion from that PR:
Just saying that I fully agree with every word here. |
Hi! I have looked over the plan for the upcoming release and could not find any mention about the status of this issue. Thus far, using jupyter-ai has been great and our users are very happy with it, but we feel it would be even better if we could substitute some of the built-in chat handlers. For instance, we could enable the RAG functionality offered by the How does this functionality fit within the existing timeplan/vision of jupyter-ai? Is someone working actively on it? Would a PR be welcomed, or are other features prioritized for now? Side note: I am also curious on why this option is not allowed? We are explicitly checking for it (here, and here) but I am not sure why we are limiting this tool's flexibility. |
@ddnimara sorry I missed your reply; if you do open a PR I would be happy to review it. |
I'd also find this very useful. It would be nice if we could extend the commands in some way too |
Problem
After #398 is merged, developers can only add slash commands, and cannot modify existing slash commands.
Proposed Solution
Allow developers to modify existing slash commands in the Jupyter AI chat interface.
Additional context
We should also update the help message if a built-in chat command is rewritten or disabled; see #436.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: